<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>blogsNH - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</link>
 <description>Comments</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>At the risk of repeating myself...</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/george_duncan/chinks_in_the_armor#comment-2559</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The reason you constantly attack McCain is simple really...People who are inside of the Obama campaign can&amp;#39;t specify their candidates policies so how could you? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What scares you is the fact that If you took both the candidates resumes, deleted the names and simply listed their accomplishments and experience, Obama would not be in the top ten never mind the top two.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New national polling data suggests that American voters are doing just that and the numbers do not bode well for the chosen one of the Democrat party. Perhaps you should delay the coronation for a little bit!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have a great McDay! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  8 Aug 2008 12:49:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scibmi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2559 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>McSame, McShame</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/george_duncan/chinks_in_the_armor#comment-2558</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I will support Senator McCain because he Will help create an energy policy that will include increasing domestic capacity as well as looking for new sources of energy. If he falters I and many other conservatives will be there to remind him of our commitment to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I will support Senator McCain because he will intelligently prosecute the war on terror&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McSame will do nothing different than George W. Bush has done for the last 7.5 years.  He will continue to destroy what was once a great nation.  You who think otherwise, are delusional. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  8 Aug 2008 10:44:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Evans</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2558 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Campaign Contributions</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/george_duncan/chinks_in_the_armor#comment-2557</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If I read Judy&amp;#39;s link correctly, only two people have contributed to political campaigns from Barnstead, NH, the happy home of our own BB; he wasn&amp;#39;t one of them.  You lied to me, Billo. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  8 Aug 2008 10:40:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Evans</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2557 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bush is not a conservative!</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/bill_bunker/sneaky_agenda_this_is_what_is_wrong_with_congress#comment-2556</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Bill -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No conservative am I, and neither do I think W. Bush is.  His track record is long and liberal on many a legislative and enforcement front.  He and Billy-Bob Clinton have more in common than not.  This thread is nearing (has already attained) its useful live, but this may be a worthy topic for another post-fest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Contemplating the intricacies of Conservatism from my crag in the rocks,  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  C. dog e. doG &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  8 Aug 2008 10:34:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>C. dog e. doG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2556 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bill -
No conservative am I,</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/bill_bunker/sneaky_agenda_this_is_what_is_wrong_with_congress#comment-2555</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Bill -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No conservative am I, and neither do I think W. Bush is.  His track record is long and liberal on many a legislative and enforcement front.  He and Billy-Bob Clinton have more in common than not.  This thread is nearing (has already attained) its useful live, but this may be a worthy topic for another post-fest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Contemplating the intricacies of Conservatism from my crag in the rocks,  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  C. dog e. doG &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  8 Aug 2008 10:33:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>C. dog e. doG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2555 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Finding Life and Love in a Pet Store</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/terri_oberg/finding_life_and_love_in_a_pet_store#comment-2554</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi! I felt happy working at pet store.The barking,snizzing and shouting of the pets are like musical note.I gained self confidebce during that time.It is really wonderfull time working at pet store.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;======================================================&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mikesmithy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treatmentcenters.org/new-hampshire&quot;&gt;New Hampshire Treatment Centers&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri,  8 Aug 2008 00:20:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mikesmithy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2554 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Well..</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/george_duncan/chinks_in_the_armor#comment-2553</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do realize there were 2 George&amp;#39;s on the site.. thought we might get a response.  Again, crickets.  Both came up under the name, &amp;quot;NH.&amp;quot;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have a good night!     -J&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 20:35:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jehardy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2553 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Disappointed in Progressives</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/george_duncan/chinks_in_the_armor#comment-2552</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I yearn for a well crafted argument, that gives me pause to consider an alternative point of view. Come on George what&amp;#39;s the worse thing that could happen? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 20:34:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scibmi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2552 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not Nice Judy...................................................</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/george_duncan/chinks_in_the_armor#comment-2551</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not nice Judy....... I could not decipher that site anyway.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Crickets are plentiful on this blog post.  I am sure that anyone who disagrees will be dismissed with the traditional silence that we have come to expect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be good to have point by point debate, discussion and discovery of maybe some points that would bring us closer together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disappointing indeed.  It seems like a waste of time to pull out the research on all of the topics and then be met with silence.  It does speak volumes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 19:42:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bill Bunker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2551 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hey</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/bill_bunker/sneaky_agenda_this_is_what_is_wrong_with_congress#comment-2550</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey guys, I have been out of the loop all week but good conversation and Mike seems to illustrate the lack of willingness to debate with facts, point to point from some on the left.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rest are just ignoring this back and forth because they dismiss it.  It used to be that liberals wanted the debate and discussion and conservatives took the other approach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is humorous see that the tables have turned.  I guess the question begs, do we want people who are ready to discuss and debate, striving for consensus running the country or people who just want to finger point and chant slogans and talking points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope all Americans are aware of the differences.  I agree with progressives that Bush has done a pretty poor job, but that is no reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater and stereotype all conservatives, painting them with the same brush.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would go point to point with any progressive, anywhere and anytime.  I would not win every point but they would not either.  That is called compromise and building consensus, however, it seems that some citizens are not interested in that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott, Dog and Judy, let&amp;#39;s keep it logical and factual....let others express their points with emotion......we need to keep embracing the need for debate and try (although it is nearly impossible) to get some discussion going on....point by point discussion!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is the only way that we will unite as a country.  And..........at least one side is uninterested. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 19:37:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bill Bunker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2550 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Do you want to have a conversation???</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/bill_bunker/sneaky_agenda_this_is_what_is_wrong_with_congress#comment-2549</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Michael,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it your preference to continue with outrageous and inflammatory statements that really lead nowhere... Tell me what you believe and the reasons why you believe what you do. Present the facts that support your belief, and we can have a great conversation. I might even agree with you from time to time. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At a minimum &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;I&lt;/span&gt; will respect your ability to frame an intelligent defense of your beliefs. Continue on your current path and we are only left with who is able to disarm the other with the most aplomb and whether mercy should be shown in the dispatch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I look forward to seeing you at your intellectual best.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 17:21:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scibmi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2549 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mikey the Marm</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/bill_bunker/sneaky_agenda_this_is_what_is_wrong_with_congress#comment-2548</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Remember Mikey -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ninny nanny state whose apron strings you tie everyday requires the imbecility of its subjects, as you so well know being a former government schoolmarm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Recalling Imus&amp;#39;s great line about the Grateful Dead: &amp;quot;we will be when they are&amp;quot;,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  C. dog e. doG  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 17:20:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>C. dog e. doG</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2548 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reagan was an imbecile,</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/bill_bunker/sneaky_agenda_this_is_what_is_wrong_with_congress#comment-2547</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Reagan was an imbecile, nothing more, IMHO.  But you&amp;#39;re certainly entitled to worship him if you want.  Like a friend once said, it&amp;#39;s always best to say something good about the dead.  Reagan is dead.  Good. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 16:31:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Evans</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2547 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Better Yet.. Who is George?? </title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/george_duncan/chinks_in_the_armor#comment-2546</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ooooo!  I Love Google.   Even if it is a Left leaning establishment.    &amp;lt;wink&amp;gt;          &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/george-duncan.asp?cycle=08&quot;&gt;http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/george-duncan.asp?cycle=08&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 15:57:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jehardy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2546 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where&#039;s George?</title>
 <link>http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal/blog_entry/george_duncan/chinks_in_the_armor#comment-2545</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;George, you started this thing.....Well?  I was hoping for a spirited and thoughtful rebuttal of the points raised throughout this chain....  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 15:27:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scibmi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2545 at http://www.blogsnh.com/drupal</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
