We're arguing about the drinking age again

|

                The presidents of 100 top colleges are starting a campaign to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18, the Associated Press reported Aug 19.  They say it will reduce binge drinking, which is a major issue on college campuses.  Binge drinking is more exciting to students when it is illegal, they say.

                The group Mothers against Drunk Driving (MADD) are unalterably against this.  They say that parents who care about their children’s safety should not send them to any school that participates in this campaign.  They argue that these presidents have given up trying to enforce safe drinking policies.

                If 18-year-olds can buy alcohol, 16-year-olds can get it, and drive their cars.  They destroy other people, not just themselves.  New Hampshire raised its drinking age to 21 years ago partly because too many high school kids were involved in fatal auto accidents. 

                Illegality does not cause binge drinking.  College students do it because everybody else does. Kids that age think they’ll live forever.  The consequences they see only happen to other people.

                The idea that colleges must act in loco parentis (in place of a parent) was old-fashioned 40 years ago. It should only be invoked in matters of life and death – like this one.  Even if students are going to drink at 18 anyway, the state and college should not say it’s OK, or abandon its responsibility to the safety of its students and community.


Well, you got this one right......

You are correct about this one, never thought I would say it.

The primary issue is that sociologists and psychologists perform studies and come up with peer reviewed material that is then embraced by academia.

Bottom line, as you flawlessly stated:

"College students do it because everybody else does. Kids that age think they’ll live forever.  The consequences they see only happen to other people."       

Nice piece, Ken! 


Leave things as they are.

You have another supporter on this issue.  I agree with Bill.


Scott Ives's picture

Me too!

Set high standards, enforce the rules and the students will rise to meet the higher standards!


Leave the Age Where it is...

This is another one of those "What are they thinking?" questions.   I've heard all the arguments now, not just from colleges - but in regards to our military as well.  If they are old enough to be soldiers, they should be old enough to drink.

The truth is, no matter what - it's too easy for those under aged to get their hands on it anyway.  It's an age old question. It was too easy when we all were that age.  It just doesn't have a bit of common sense or merit to lower the bar and make it even easier.

And yes, when you're that age, you do think you'll live forever and that "tragedy" on the news would never happen to me.  It takes a whole boat load longer life experience to realize that eventually, bad things will happen to everyone.. even without looking for ways to accelerate that process. 


Scott Ives's picture

Check this out...

http://www.amethystinitiative.org/ 

These people represent HIGHER education...They have to be smoking something!!!!


Well, It goes to show you......

Looking at the list of supporters and then at the picture on the front page it proves that intellectual accomplishment does not mean that you have any common sense at all.

Unbelievable......that is progressive thought in our Universities.   

User login

Brought To You By




Browse archives

« November 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
           
3 4
12 13 14
18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30