Thoughts on Obama-mania and the Youth Vote
I have to admit that I’ve been pretty much glued to the presidential primary race over the past few weeks, watching all of the results come in live and reading the latest snippets of information about the campaigns. There have been a lot of ups and downs for the candidates, and some game-changing withdrawals from the race recently. There have also been a great deal of surprises that have shaken up contests that once seemed fairly static.
Going in, no one would have expected Gov. Mike Huckabee to be one of the last men standing, now duking it out with Sen. John McCain in the delegate race toward the Republican National Convention. No one would have expected two of the early front runners on the Republican side, Gov. Mitt Romney and Mayor Rudy Giuliani, to bow out before the final rounds. And perhaps most surprising, and stunning to those who thought the Democratic race was over last summer, was the rise of Sen. Barack Obama as a serious contender for the Democratic nomination.
When it all comes down to it, there’s one thing that can capture Obama’s campaign: excitement. Now don’t get me wrong, there is certainly excitement in other camps. On the Republican side there is excitement (both positive and negative) about the race unfolding between Huckabee and McCain. To give Sen. Hillary Clinton credit, she’s generated a lot of excitement from voters looking for the first female president and for a return to what were perceived as better days under President Clinton. There’s no denying, however, that there hasn’t been this much excitement in a presidential primary election for quite some time.
For me, the excitement took a while to build. Initially, I took a look at all the candidates and wasn’t quite sure where I’d go. There were experienced individuals on both sides with plenty of good ideas to go around. I consider myself an independent, although I admittedly lean towards the Democrats due to their positions on many issues important to me. So, at the beginning of the fall I more or less had my personal field of candidates narrowed down to a handful, but still couldn’t find a clear candidate of choice.
After watching many debates over the course of the summer, I began leaning towards Sen. Joe Biden. I also liked Clinton, Obama, and Edwards, but felt that Biden had the most experience of the lot. Unfortunately, after a big loss in Iowa, Biden was out and I was once again candidate-less. While the candidates aimed to court New Hampshire voters, I went out to see both Edwards and Obama, and found both to be well spoken. I agreed with both of them on many issues. I appreciated Edwards’ fighting spirit, but in the end I found myself leaning toward Obama. It took me a few days to really understand why I gravitated toward the senator from Illinois, but I think my reasoning is shared by many other voters in my age group who have likewise become part of what’s been described as a “movement.”
The biggest reason for me personally is that I’m tired of seeing this country divided. In 2004, Republicans used wedge issues such as same-sex marriage and abortion to divide the electorate and distract them from more vital issues such as the war in Iraq, education, healthcare, and the economy. In 2006, Democrats used the war in Iraq to toss out scores of Republicans, some of whom were pretty mainstream voices in Congress and should have kept their seats (although on the whole I think the Republican leadership needed a reality check). Heading into 2008, I didn’t want to see yet another election of wedge issues and partisan bickering. Enter Barack Obama.
Instead of taking the usual bait and bashing the opposing side, Obama instead spoke about uniting a divided country and actually bringing independents and Republicans into a working majority to move the country forward. I don’t think it’ll be widely disputed that over the past seven or so years, Congress hasn’t really been able to get much done due to partisan politicking. The prospect of our elected officials working together appealed to me, and gave me hope that we may actually be able to heal some divisions and get something done together.
When Obama speaks, it’s not so much the flowery language that some criticize him on, but more of a call to action. At least, to me it is. The difference is that while most politicans speak in cynicism and an assessment that politics as usual is going to continue, Obama speaks in the language of hope that many politicians simply don’t understand anymore. Fortunately, the younger generation understands him loud and clear.
On the ground level, at least from what I’ve experienced, the younger generation isn’t so caught up in Republicans vs. Democrats, “conservatives” vs. “liberals,” and “right” vs. “left.” In college, I had several friends who were Republicans, some who were independents, and some who were Democrats. That didn’t stop any of us from speaking to one another, working with each other, and having some fun together. There’s so much more that unites us than divides us, and that’s the spirit of my generation, at least as far as I can tell. And unlike any other candidate out there today, Obama has been able to tap into that spirit and spawn a movement that is now building momentum.
For a quick snapshot, here’s a sampling of how the youth vote (ages: 18-24) has broken down on the Democratic side, according to exit polls from CNN:
New Hampshire: Obama 60%, Clinton 22%
New York: Obama 56%, Clinton 43%
Missouri: Obama 69%, Clinton 24%
South Carolina: Obama 65%, Clinton 25%
I don’t think youth voters are making up their minds simply because what Obama says sounds good. They take a look at his record and his stands on the issues (which are pretty detailed on his website). They also look at his past experience. It’s inspiring to see someone graduate from a top law school and then, instead of taking a high paying job at a firm, devote several years of his life to community organizing in poor urban neighborhoods. It’s reassuring to see that Obama was a professor of constitutional law and that he has spent eleven years in elected office. Although certainly not the most experienced from the original field of candidates, I think the arguments against Obama as inexperienced are a bit overblown.
In the end, though, will enthusiasm and energy in the younger electorate matter? If youth voters keep turning out in the record-breaking numbers they have been, then it may matter quite a bit. Whether you agree with Obama’s policies or not, one thing that can’t be denied is that he’s part of the reason why new voters are coming out like never before. With two historic candidates on the Democratic side, and a tough race on the Republican side, I wouldn’t venture to say it’s Obama’s presence in the race alone, but this election will certainly set a bar for youth involvement in the election process going forward. I just hope that this is only the beginning.
Re: Promises as old as politics
Hi Terry,
Thanks for your comment, and very good point. I think that's true for anyone running for office, whether it be for student union president or leader of the free world. The true test of leaders is whether or not they deliver on the promises they make. Our current president, who also ran as a "uniter," has done nothing but divide this country. I sure hope that if Obama is elected that he keeps his promises and is able to move this country forward.
When it comes down to it, it's hard to really gauge whether any of the candidates running would be able to keep all of their promises. Each candidate has laid out many proposals that sound good, but the key will be whether or not they will be able to actually implement them as president. From Clinton's mandate on healthcare to McCain's push to end pork, and from Obama's vision of a working majority to Huckabee's goal of investing in America's infrastructure again, it's easy to say what one would do as president, but it's a different thing to actually deliver.
Like I said before, I hope that whoever becomes the next president leads by actions and not just words. I think Obama has led by action in the past, but we'll see if he's able to do the same if elected president.
~Justin
The Problem With The Youth Vote
Justin,
Although I celebrate everyones right to vote, the youth vote is impressive but unfortunately they are filled with starry eyed optimism and idealistic vision.
We all went through that stage but the real world is very different. I listen to young people on the news speaking about Obama and have yet to hear one policy position on which they find a reason to support him. It is all about "HOPE".
Duval Patrick ran on the platform "Together we can..." in Massachusetts. My question was then.....Together we can what? Obama is running on "Yes we can".....the question begs, Yes we can....what?
His call to action is an empty one....no specifics and a record that illustrates that he will lead from only one side. We need someone who will govern from the middle as 50% of the people are not represented by either political party's doctrinaire beliefs.
You may be correct about a tough race for Republicans but remember, Obama and Clinton are at odds. In the end, the question is....will the youth vote be enough if Obama is the candidate to overcome the Clinton supporters who will not be able to bring themselves to vote for him? It all make an interesting year in politics.
Re: The Problem With The Youth Vote
Hi Bill,
Thanks for your comments! I can definitely understand your criticism of the youth vote, but I think there does need to be some degree of optimism for our future. It needs to be tempered with a bit of realism, but what I've been seeing from Washington for a great many years is cynicism and division, the belief by each party that only they have the right ideas to move us forward. This belief won't get us anywhere, and has proven to leave us in a gridlock.
I think (well, hope) that many of Obama's supporters, and any candidate for that matter, have made themselves familiar with his positions on issues and proposals for solving the problems facing our nation. As for Obama in particular, I think there are many policy positions that lead individuals to support him. He believes in civil rights for all Americans, a responsible end to the war in Iraq, tax cuts for the middle class, investment in college education so long as students invest their time in this country, a push for cleaner energy, and competition among schools to drive up quality, among others. Not saying he's right on the issues above, but just that he has made his positions explicit and known.
As for Deval Patrick, I'd agree that after the rush of the election was over it doesn't appear that much has gotten done yet. Obama is a different man with different experience, however, so I don't think we can necessarily equate one with the other.
Regardless of what Obama's "movement" looks like from the outside, it's hard to deny that it's getting more people involved in the political process than ever before. This is very exciting stuff! In recent primary states, Obama has received more votes than the two leading Republican candidates... combined. And these are "red" states like Virginia and South Carolina.
I guess the bottom line is that we need some optimism tempered with a will to actually get things done. Like in all nominating contests, whoever we vote for we'll need to hope they keep their campaign promises. It certainly is a very interesting year in election politics. I think that both of us are enjoying watching the drama unfold, at least. ;)
~Justin
I'm a youthful voter at 60
According to this string of comments and comments on comments, I'm still a youthful voter at 60.
Franklin Roosevelt, John F.Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan were inspiring speakers who changed things because they were not cockeyed, naive optimists. They were insprational. They formed consensus and got things done that changed America. (Many of the changes JFK set in motion his vice president finished because Kennedy did not live long enough.)
Each came along when the country was ready to change directions. Each had a way to communicate and form consensus and majorities. I think the country is ready for a big change this year, and I don't see Barack as a cockeyed naive optimist. I think he's grounded in reality and comfortable in his own skin, as those other great leaders/change agents/communicators were.





The problem with the youthful surge of support for Obama is that perhaps most of the youth are too young to recall that we have heard these same promises of bringing change to the same ole same ole. They were promises never kept, over and over again. Obama isn't the first politician going into the political arena thinking he can change the way politics operates, and thus change the world, and he most likely won't be the last either. There is no denying he is a magnificent orator, but great speeches are only a part of the job requirement. If he wins based on these promises, lets hope he can keep most of them. I shudder to think what will come if he falls short; are the hopeful, excited youth ready for that possibility?