NH Supports Civil Unions
Yesterday, the Concord Monitor released the results of a recent survey of 600 New Hampshire voters, who voiced their opinions on gay marriage and civil unions. Although a majority of New Hampshire citizens oppose gay marriage, a plurality support granting full legal rights to same-sex couples under the name of a civil union. The results are not shocking, but do show the current mood in the state regarding the issue. I think this creates the perfect opportunity to get some forward traction on protecting New Hampshire's families that happen to be led by same-sex couples.
First, let's start with gay marriage. In the poll, 55 percent of those polled said they opposed this form of legal recognition for same-sex couples, while 35 percent were in favor, with 10 percent undecided on the issue. This may look dismal to some, but compared to other parts of the country it is actually fairly moderate. I believe that numbers like this in part show a misunderstanding of the issue, and what it means legally. Civil marriage is much different from religious marriage, but since both bear the word "marriage," the issue often gets tangled up in tradition and religion.
Where the most attention should be paid at this point in time is that 44 percent of those polled supported granting all of the rights afforded to opposite-sex couples to same-sex couples, only under the name of civil unions. This was higher than the 40 percent who opposed civil unions. In the near term, civil unions may be the way to ensure that all of New Hampshire's families are protected under state law, although it is certainly not the full equality gays and lesbians dream of.
There is good news on the horizon in that legislators are already talking about the issue, and a bill to bring civil unions to New Hampshire in the upcoming legislative session looks likely. If civil unions are approved in the legislature, it is likely that Governor Lynch, who has supported granting domestic partnership rights in New Hampshire’s public university system, would also support a bill that grants same-sex couples the same rights as marriage without using that label.
To a certain extent it does irk me that we can’t just take one more step in the near term and try for full marriage equality, but the realist in me is cognizant of the fact that same-sex marriage is still a touchy subject for most Americans, and New Hampshire citizens for that matter. At this time I think it is important to focus on what is achievable in the near term, so that New Hampshire’s same-sex couples and their children will be protected under state law as soon as possible. Then, once everyone realizes that the sky isn’t falling, the push for full equality can be fully realized.
I know this is a touchy subject for most gays and lesbians. After all, why should we settle for a separate and unequal institution, when our straight friends and family members can simply get married once they find the loves of their lives, or just someone of the opposite sex? The simple answer: we shouldn’t. At the same time, though, we need to keep in mind that there are sometimes several steps towards full equality, and civil unions are a great stepping stone to full legal equality for same-sex couples.
So, in the near term let’s make the push for New Hampshire to become the next state to offer legal protection to same-sex couples, whether it be called marriage, civil unions, or domestic partnerships. All I know is that whatever it may be called in the short-term, marriage equality will be a reality in New Hampshire, and hopefully the entire country, in the not too distant future.
Civil marriage is much
Civil marriage is much different from religious marriage, but since both bear the word "marriage," the issue often gets tangled up in tradition and religion.
I think you've hit the nail on the head. The word marriage definately holds religious connotations, and I don't know how many people I've known who are fully supportive of giving same sex couples the same rights as married heterosexual couples pending it's called a "civil union" instead of a "same sex marriage". It's interesting how semantics come into play here.
That said, I've always had trouble understanding why the homosexual community so strongly desires to have it called "civil marriage" rather than "civil union".... Is there a specific legal reasoning why or does it just come down to nothing more than semantics in the end?
Re: support
Definitely, RT. I'm hoping that the next time survey results come out it gets only better. The trend certainly seems to be towards more tolerance and understanding. Thanks for your comment!
re: Civil marriage is much
Hi Nicole. Thanks for your comments, and very good question! I can't speak for everyone in the gay community, but I can tell you why I personally believe the name of the union is important.
If recognition for same-sex relationships was solely about the legal rights and legal recognition, I don't see why the term "civil unions" wouldn't do. In fact, I don't see why any union would need to be called anything else if it were just a package of rights. In our communities, though, the word "marriage" has a lot of meaning beyond just the package of benefits and responsibilities it entails from a legal standpoint.
Growing up, I went to many weddings where relatives and family friends would get married, and would be able to call themselves a "married couple." In their communities, their marriages gave a sense of stability, and also came with all of the traditional connotations surrounding the word. I think that's just what gays and lesbians want, to be on the same level as their peers, such as brothers, sisters, parents, and friends.
If unions of any kind were just about legal rights, "civil unions" would be acceptable, but since "marriage" is about so much more than legal rights, I think that's why the gay community is pushing harder to get on the same footing as everyone else. While legally "civil unions" and "civil marriages" are quite similar in this country, in society they create two distinct groups of people, and one obviously has a wider understanding.
I hope this helped, and let me know if you have any other questions! :)
my additional thoughts
please check out my blog on the subject on myspace:
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=37254283&blogID=215205863&MyToken=ce14a0e2-a422-43d0-89b6-2cf656a3c612






I take the survey as a good sign, people are starting to open their eyes.