Evolution vs Creation
Here is a balanced look at evolution versus creation for those who are open minded enough to consider it.
Over the past week or two, the Monitor has published numerous letters debating Creation versus Evolution. That has tied in nicely to other news stories including the visit to the United States by the Pope and the role of religious belief in the upcoming election.
Many Monitor letter writers dismiss creationism and point to evolution as ‘settled science.’ Yes, these writers believe that they have it figured out, obviously due to their academic indoctrination and enlightenment.
Many Monitor letter writers dismiss evolution and point to creationism. Their absolute truth comes from the Bible and their lifelong teachings and indoctrination of a church.
Here is some food for thought on evolution and creationism and let’s leave Darwin, the Bible, Garden of Eden and natural selection out of the equation for a moment.
Think about this, what came before the universe? Nothingness? What is nothingness?
What is beyond the universe? Is there more than one universe? Who or what created it? If the “Big Bang” is accurate, why did it happen?
Is life on Earth a result of a series of chance events? Are we so enlightened that we know enough about the universe or even our own planet that we can come to firm conclusions about anything scientific?
We are still learning about our own planet as well as the universe and we have only a puny fraction of what we think are answers to life and our existence. Most are theories based on our limited capacity and intellect, which are directly linked and contaminated by our own experience and belief.
Several letter writers implied that they are so certain of evolution due to the ‘science’ involved. Science, after decades of research can’t cure the common cold, cancer, AIDS and thousands of other heinous diseases. They find cures but have no real idea how or why many of them work absent of theories.
Scientific studies show that vitamin supplements are healthy one week and then recently, a scientific study informed us that those same supplements can kill us.
Long held scientific thought and theory is questioned every day and we are still learning about our planet and universe. Gravity is a pervasive force and is a certainty but the reasons for global warming are not. This same principle applies to evolution.
Yet, in light of the trial and error of science, do we know so much about genetics and natural selection to be certain about evolution and validate Darwin’s theory?
We can’t prove many things that exist in the Bible as well, but I do believe that those events were explained with good intent by people who used their limited capacity to explain events, at that point in their development and history.
I believe that future generations may look back on today's evolutionists in much the same way.
Evolution or Creation? I am not sure that any of us has the ability to unequivocally validate either premise. Are we to assume that we are the end all and be all of existence, that there is no creator or that we are a random mistake?
We should be careful not to think in absolutes. To assume that every word of an ancient historical text is 100% accurate without reasoning is questionable. To assume that academic enlightenment is the end all and be all and an absolute truth is naive.
One thing is for certain, we have neither the ability nor the mental capacity to answer with any certainty what came before the universe, if we are alone or if we are the pawn and subject of something bigger.
I will opt for belief in something bigger. I am sure that we have evolved in some way, shape or manner but how did we get here, as bacteria or a single cell amoeba? There are lots of theories but little solid proof. In the end maybe both sides have a legitimate argument. So many questions remain and so many will remain unanswered long after the generations existing in 2008 are dead and gone.
To assume that we understand with any certainty our existence on Earth, how we got here or if it is a chance event is foolhardy, elitist and arrogant!
Remember, 'scientists' in 1300 believed that they Earth was flat and people swallowed that hook, line and sinker, based on flawed sources: the limited capacity of the human brain and our inability to understand what is beyond our world and our grasp.
Thanks
Well brave? I am not sure of that but I do open myself to much ridicule and abuse. That is OK because if we are not willing to take a stand for what we believe and believe in then we are sheep cowering to the will of others.
Nice comments. I do know one thing that is absolute for you and I.......coming up in just a few weeks. I hope you enjoy your trip!!!!!!!!!
Bill
This is a silly blog.
This is a silly blog. Evolution is settled science. That not all the questions have been answered doesn't mean that won't be one day. Creationism is not much different that believing the earth is flat. People are entitled in this country to believe whatever silly things they want. We see that quite often in blogs in the Concord Monitor. But to believe in creationism over evolution is just plain ignorant. And Santa Claus is real too. Right.
In the beginning........
As I stated, this is not about religion, Michael. I guess you might have an inisde track as you must have lived thousands of years ago to be so certain.
The point here is that evolution is not "settled science"; a phrase used by those on the Left, to end debate. That is the same phrase used in conjunction with global warming another "absolute" swallowed hook line and sinker by the Left. Evolution is a theory and even evolutionists do not agree on much on the how's and why's beyond that this "theory" is a fact.
If we believe that we are the end all and be all and just bacteria, that says something pretty sad about the value that your "settled science" puts on life in general.
Leave religion out of it and ask yourself the questions in this blog. I would doubt that you could answer any of them.
You have the right to believe whatever you want but the argument is about absolute and faith that we place in our fellow men who could sell us any theory that they want. IN the end none of us alive today will know the truth but the science is evolving.
Dismissing the possibilities and thinking that we are alone or all of this was created from nothingness is like wearing blinders and marching in lockstep.
That seems to be what those who have disdain for religion accuse those believers and followers in doing. Seems like it is one big circle of belief but with two theories.
There is more evidence that
There is more evidence that 9-11 was an inside job than there is to support creationism. Believe what you will. Ignorance is bliss they say.
Oh!
OH,
9-11 was an inside job. Are you in that 'nut case' conspiracy brotherhood?
I understand now Michael; 9-11 was a conspiracy, religion is a conspiracy...what is next?
It must feel powerful to sit on a moral perch deciding what is relative and intellectual and what is ignorant belief.
That does not sound like the "inclusion" of ideas that those who believe in evolution champion for their pet beliefs.
That is all telling....thanks Mike!
Inclusion of ideas...hmmmm.
Inclusion of ideas...hmmmm. There are useful "ideas" and meaningless nonsense. ID is, in my opinion, nonsense and does not warrant inclusion in intelligent discussion. But as I've said before, you are entitled to believe anything you want...but please, give the rest of us a break and keep your thoughts to yourself and stop trying to force it upon the rest of the world. That's the arrogance of the Right's agenda that you and those like you represent in your ignorance.
Really?!?
I am very glad that we have enlightened souls like yourself to help us sort through what is useful and what is nonsense.
Let's follow your premise and you history of responses to this blog for a moment as well as your world view, Michael.
You believe that it is possible that the Twin Towers attack was an inside job. That is nonsense. You ask to give you and others of the enlightened Left a break and keep my thoughts to myself and stop forcing them on the rest of the world.
So what you are saying is that in the arena of ideas, any idea or thought or viewpoint that does not meet your criteria is a forcing it "upon the rest of the world". Your wish is that those who do not share the progressive viewpoint should just shut up. Your reasoning is that those views are wrong and ignorant.
And you talk about ignorance. Inclusion of ideas, diversity of opinion, bi-partisanship, bringing people together seems to only apply when one takes the view of the Left.
This blog was not about religion and I made that clear. It was also not about the Left or Right. The arrogance of the Left however leaves them assuming that they are enlightened through their education and learning. That comes from the teachings of others which can be just as tainted as the teachings of religion through the ages.
Ignorant, if you are closed minded enough to think you have it all figured out. Obviously you either think you do or just want to believe what you are told without question.



Hi Bill!
Great blog! I agree with you 100%. Nothing is absolute and the unknown is just that; unknown. I believe that the evolution theory is a bunch of bull, but I respect the opinions and beliefs of others, no matter how strongly I disagree. Everyone has a right to their own thought processes and belief systems...if it resonates with them, then so be it...you are mighty brave, as usual, to open up a discussion on such a controversial subject:)
Tracy M